Research Articles
DOI DOI: 10.62063/ecb-56

Dynamics of C-terminal tail of human STING structure, active and inactive conformations

Abstract

The Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) protein is a transmembrane protein encoded by the STING1 gene. It is a critical component of the innate immune system, which serves as a sensor for cytosolic DNA and plays a crucial role in activating the Type-I interferon pathway. The enzyme cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) binds to DNA and assists in the synthesis of cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) from GTP and ATP. This reaction stimulates the activation of TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1), an enzyme involved in signaling pathways that result in the phosphorylation of STING. The interaction between STING, TBK1, and IRF3 selectively interferes with IRF3 phosphorylation without obstructing TBK1 activation, leading to mutations in STING. This process indicates that STING functions as a scaffold protein, guiding and supporting TBK1’s phosphorylation of IRF3. IRF3 activation occurs when STING’s C-terminal tail (CTT) binds to IRF3, leading to conformational change. STING’s CTT tail plays a crucial structural and functional role in regulating innate immune responses. Understanding the structure of the CTT loop is vital for unraveling the mechanism of STING-mediated signaling. In this study, we performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate the importance of the CTT loop for STING activation through comparing the molecular interactions within STING-TBK1 complexes in their inactive and active states. We integrated the findings of previous modeling studies into our simulations.

How to Cite

Poyraz, Y., Kavalci, Z., Ozcicek, E., & Essiz, S. (2026). Dynamics of C-terminal tail of human STING structure, active and inactive conformations. The European Chemistry and Biotechnology Journal, (5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.62063/ecb-56

References

  1. Al-Masri, R. a. O., Audu-Bida, H., & Eşsiz, Ş. (2021). Modeling of C-terminal tail of human STING and its interaction with tank-binding kinase 1. TURKISH JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-2108-90
  2. Bai, J., & Liu, F. (2019). The cGAS-cGAMP-STING Pathway: A Molecular Link Between Immunity and Metabolism. Diabetes, 68(6), 1099–1108. https://doi.org/10.2337/dbi18-0052
  3. Barber, G. N. (2015). STING: infection, inflammation and cancer. Nature Reviews. Immunology, 15(12), 760–770. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3921
  4. Barker, J. R., Koestler, B. J., Carpenter, V. K., Burdette, D. L., Waters, C. M., Vance, R. E., & Valdivia, R. H. (2013). STING-dependent recognition of cyclic di-AMP mediates type I interferon responses during Chlamydia trachomatis infection. mBio, 4(3), e00018–e13. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00018-13
  5. Bridgeman, A., Maelfait, J., Davenne, T., Partridge, T., Peng, Y., Mayer, A., Dong, T., Kaever, V., Borrow, P., & Rehwinkel, J. (2015). Viruses transfer the antiviral second messenger cGAMP between cells. Science, 349(6253), 1228–1232. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab3632
  6. Brooks, B. R., Bruccoleri, R. E., Olafson, B. D., States, D. J., Swaminathan, S., & Karplus, M. (1983). CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 4(2), 187–217. doi:10.1002/jcc.540040211
  7. Chen, Q., Sun, L., & Chen, Z. J. (2016). Regulation and function of the cGAS-STING pathway of cytosolic DNA sensing. Nature immunology, 17(10), 1142–1149. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3558
  8. Ergun, S. L., & Li, L. (2020). Structural Insights into STING Signaling. Trends in cell biology, 30(5), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2020.01.010
  9. Gratz, N., Hartweger, H., Matt, U., Kratochvill, F., Janos, M., Sigel, S., Drobits, B., Li, X. D., Knapp, S., & Kovarik, P. (2011). Type I interferon production induced by Streptococcus pyogenes-derived nucleic acids is required for host protection. PLoS pathogens, 7(5), e1001345. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001345
  10. Huang, J., & MacKerell, A. D., Jr (2013). CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: validation based on comparison to NMR data. Journal of computational chemistry, 34(25), 2135–2145. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23354
  11. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., & Schulten, K. (1996). VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. Journal of Molecular Graphics, 14(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
  12. Hussain, B., Xie, Y., Jabeen, U., Lu, D., Yang, B., Wu, C., & Shang, G. (2022). Activation of STING Based on Its Structural Features. Frontiers in immunology, 13, 808607. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.808607
  13. Ma, Z., Jacobs, S. R., West, J. A., Stopford, C., Zhang, Z., Davis, Z., Barber, G. N., Glaunsinger, B. A., Dittmer, D. P., & Damania, B. (2015). Modulation of the cGAS-STING DNA sensing pathway by gammaherpesviruses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(31), E4306–E4315. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503831112
  14. M., Diamond, M. S., … Rice, C. M. (2015). Corrigendum: Pan-viral specificity of IFN-induced genes reveals new roles for cGAS in innate immunity. Nature, 525(7567), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14555
  15. Ishikawa, H., & Barber, G. N. (2008). STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signaling. Nature, 455(7213), 674–678. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07317
  16. Ishikawa, H., Ma, Z., & Barber, G. N. (2009). STING regulates intracellular DNA-mediated, type I interferon-dependent innate immunity. Nature, 461(7265), 788–792. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08476
  17. Pastor RW, Brooks BR, Szabo A. An analysis of the accuracy of Langevin and molecular dynamics algorithms. Mol Phys. 1988;65(6):1409-1419. doi:10.1080/00268978800101881
  18. Patel, S., & Jin, L. (2019). TMEM173 variants and potential importance to human biology and disease. Genes & Immunity, 20(1), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41435-018-0029-9
  19. Phillips, J. C., Hardy, D. J., Maia, J. D. C., Stone, J. E., Ribeiro, J. V., Bernardi, R. C., Buch, R., Fiorin, G., Hénin, J., Jiang, W., McGreevy, R., Melo, M. C. R., Radak, B. K., Skeel, R. D., Singharoy, A., Wang, Y., Roux, B., Aksimentiev, A., Luthey-Schulten, Z., Kalé, L. V., … Tajkhorshid, E. (2020). Scalable molecular dynamics on CPU and GPU architectures with NAMD. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 153(4), 044130. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0014475
  20. Schoggins, J. W., MacDuff, D. A., Imanaka, N., Gainey, M. D., Shrestha, B., Eitson, J. L., Mar, K. B., Richardson, R. B., Ratushny, A. V., Litvak, V., Dabelic, R., Manicassamy, B., Aitchison, J. D., Aderem, A., Elliott, R. M., García-Sastre, A., Racaniello, V., Snijder, E. J., Yokoyama, W.
  21. Shang, G., Zhang, C., Chen, Z. J., Bai, X. C., & Zhang, X. (2019). Cryo-EM structures of STING reveal its mechanism of activation by cyclic GMP-AMP. Nature, 567(7748), 389–393. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0998-5
  22. Smith J. A. (2021). STING, the Endoplasmic Reticulum, and Mitochondria: Is Three a Crowd or a Conversation?. Frontiers in immunology, 11, 611347. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.611347
  23. Sun, L., Wu, J., Du, F., Chen, X., & Chen, Z. J. (2013). Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase Is a Cytosolic DNA Sensor That Activates the Type I Interferon Pathway. Science, 339(6121), 786–791. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232458
  24. Tanaka, Y., & Chen, Z. J. (2012). STING specifies IRF3 phosphorylation by TBK1 in the cytosolic DNA signaling pathway. Science signaling, 5(214), ra20. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2002521
  25. Touw, W.G. et al. (2015) “A series of PDB-related databanks for everyday needs,” Nucleic Acids Research, 43(D1), pp. D364–D368. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKU1028.
  26. Tsuchiya, Y., Jounai, N., Takeshita, F., Ishii, K. J., & Mizuguchi, K. (2016). Ligand-induced Ordering of the C-terminal Tail Primes STING for Phosphorylation by TBK1. EBioMedicine, 9, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.05.039
  27. Wan, D., Jiang, W., & Hao, J. (2020). Research Advances in How the cGAS-STING Pathway Controls the Cellular Inflammatory Response. Frontiers in immunology, 11, 615. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00615
  28. Watson, R. O., Bell, S. L., MacDuff, D. A., Kimmey, J. M., Diner, E. J., Olivas, J., Vance, R. E., Stallings, C. L., Virgin, H. W., & Cox, J. S. (2015). The Cytosolic Sensor cGAS Detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA to Induce Type I Interferons and Activate Autophagy. Cell host & microbe, 17(6), 811–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2015.05.004
  29. Webb, B., & Sali, A. (2016). Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpbi.3
  30. Yang, H., Wang, H., Ren, J., Chen, Q., & Chen, Z. J. (2017). cGAS is essential for cellular senescence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(23). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705499114
  31. Zhao, B., Du, F., Xu, P., Shu, C., Sankaran, B., Bell, S. L., Liu, M., Lei, Y., Gao, X., Fu, X., Zhu, F., Liu, Y., Laganowsky, A., Zheng, X., Ji, J.-Y., West, A. P., Watson, R. O., & Li, P. (2019). A conserved PLPLRT/SD motif of STING mediates the recruitment and activation of TBK1. Nature, 569(7758), 718–722. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1228-x
  32. Zhang, C., Shang, G., Gui, X., Zhang, X., Bai, X. C., & Chen, Z. J. (2019). Structural basis of STING binding with and phosphorylation by TBK1. Nature, 567(7748), 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1000-2