Research Articles
Early View Article
DOI DOI: 10.62063/ecb-80

Groundnut shells to bioethanol: comparative yeast performance and ethanol characterization

Zainab Ibrahim S G Adiya1, Muhammad Ahmad2, Muhammad Soliu Abdulqudus Olamilekan3
  1. 1 Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto
  2. 2 Usmanu Danfodiyo University
  3. 3 Usmanu Danfodiyo University

Abstract

The effect of  three different yeast species (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cariocanus, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe) on bioethanol production from groundnut shells was investigated at exactly same process conditions i.e temperature of 35 and five days fermentation period. The physicochemical properties of the generated bioethanol from the optimal yeast species (Saccharomyces cariocanus) was also evaluated. It was found that the descending sugar concentrations were similar across all the three species (72.76–74.35 mg/dL) with negligible variations. However, significant variations were observed in bioethanol quantity and percentage yield. Saccharomyces cariocanus generated the highest quantity of bioethanol (102 mL) and yield (34%), followed by saccharomyces cerevisiae (90 mL, 30%), with Schizosaccharomyces pombe having the lowest performance (73 mL, 24%). This reveals the superior fermentative efficiency of Saccharomyces cariocanus in converting sugars to ethanol. The physicochemical properties of bioethanol produced by Saccharomyces cariocanus were generally comparable to ASTM standards (indicating acceptable fuel quality) with slight deviations in density and boiling point which could be attributed to impurities. The study emphasizes the importance of yeast species selection in enhancing bioethanol production from groundnut shell feedstocks and identifies Saccharomyces cariocanus as a promising yeast for effective ethanol fermentation. It is concluded that groundnut shells are promising feedstock for bioethanol production but further process optimization is required to fully meet fuel standards.

How to Cite

Adiya, Z. I. S. G., Ahmad, M., & Olamilekan, M. S. A. (2026). Groundnut shells to bioethanol: comparative yeast performance and ethanol characterization. The European Chemistry and Biotechnology Journal, (6), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.62063/ecb-80
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

References

  1. Abdul Kareem Joyia, M., Ahmad, M., Chen, Y.-F., Mustaqeem, M., Ali, A., Abbas, A., & Ashraf Gondal, M. (2024). Trends and advances in sustainable bioethanol production technologies from first to fourth generation: A critical review. Energy Conversion and Management, 321, 119037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119037
  2. Adiya, Z. I. S. G., Adamu, S. S., Ibrahim, M. A., Okoh, E., & Ibrahim, D. (2022). Comparative study of bioethanol produced from different agro-industrial biomass residues. Earthline Journal of Chemical Sciences, 7(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.34198/ejcs.7222.143152
  3. Adiya, Z. I. S. G., & Atiku, F. A. (2024). Theoretical thermal efficiency of conventional steam reforming of groundnut shell. DYSONA – Applied Science, 5(1), 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.30493/DAS.2023.377614
  4. Adiya, Z. I. S. G., & Shehu, S. (2022). Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production from conventional steam reforming of groundnut shell. UMYU Journal of Pure and Industrial Chemical Research, 2(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.55688/ujpicr21.007
  5. Ajeigbe, H. A., Waliyar, F., Echekwu, C., Kunihya, A., Motagi, B., Eniaiyeju, D., & Inuwa, A. (2015). A farmer’s guide to profitable groundnut production in Nigeria.
  6. Akubueze, E., & Nwaze, I. (2023). Suitability of groundnut shells for bioethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Materials Science Research and Reviews, 2(11), 34–39.
  7. Amaefule, D., Nwakaire, J., Ogbuagu, N., Anyadike, C., Ogenyi, C., Ohagwu, C., & Egbuhuzor, O. (2023). Effect of production factors on the bioethanol yield of tropical sawdust. International Journal of Energy Research, 2023, 9983840. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9983840
  8. Bekele Bayu, A., Abeto Amibo, T., & Beyan, S. M. (2022). Process optimization for acid hydrolysis and characterization of bioethanol from leftover injera waste by using response surface methodology: Central composite design. International Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2022, 4809589. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4809589
  9. Ceaser, R., Montané, D., Constantí, M., & Medina, F. (2025). Current progress on lignocellulosic bioethanol including a technological and economical perspective. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(11), 25993–26038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04792-2
  10. Das, N., Jena, P. K., Padhi, D., Kumar Mohanty, M., & Sahoo, G. (2023). A comprehensive review of characterization, pretreatment and its applications on different lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 13(2), 1503–1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01294-3
  11. Demeke, M. M., Dietz, H., Li, Y., Foulquié-Moreno, M. R., Mutturi, S., Deprez, S., Den Abt, T., Bonini, B. M., Liden, G., & Dumortier, F. (2013). Development of a D-xylose fermenting and inhibitor tolerant industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with high performance in lignocellulose hydrolysates using metabolic and evolutionary engineering. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 6(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-89
  12. Fernandes, M. C., Ferro, M. D., Paulino, A. F. C., Chaves, H. T., Evtuguin, D. V., & Xavier, A. M. R. B. (2018). Comparative study on hydrolysis and bioethanol production from cardoon and rockrose pretreated by dilute acid hydrolysis. Industrial Crops and Products, 111, 633–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.11.037
  13. Gombert, A. K., & Van Maris, A. J. (2015). Improving conversion yield of fermentable sugars into fuel ethanol in 1st generation yeast-based production processes. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 33, 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2014.12.012
  14. Jain, S., & Kumar, S. (2024). A comprehensive review of bioethanol production from diverse feedstocks: Current advancements and economic perspectives. Energy, 296, 131130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131130
  15. Kazmi, A., Sultana, T., Ali, A., Nijabat, A., Li, G., & Hou, H. (2025). Innovations in bioethanol production: A comprehensive review of feedstock generations and technology advances. Energy Strategy Reviews, 57, 101634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101634
  16. Kosaric, N., & Velikonja, J. (1995). Liquid and gaseous fuels from biotechnology: Challenge and opportunities. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 16(2–3), 111–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1995.tb00161.x
  17. Mangwanda, T., Johnson, J. B., Mani, J. S., Jackson, S., Chandra, S., McKeown, T., White, S., & Naiker, M. (2021). Processes, challenges and optimisation of rum production from molasses—A contemporary review. Fermentation, 7(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7010021
  18. Mohd Azhar, S. H., Abdulla, R., Jambo, S. A., Marbawi, H., Gansau, J. A., Mohd Faik, A. A., & Rodrigues, K. F. (2017). Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: A review. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports, 10, 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.03.003
  19. Nazli, R. I. (2020). Evaluation of different sweet sorghum cultivars for bioethanol yield potential and bagasse combustion characteristics in a semiarid Mediterranean environment. Biomass and Bioenergy, 139, 105624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105624
  20. Nissen, T. L., Kielland-Brandt, M. C., Nielsen, J., & Villadsen, J. (2000). Optimization of ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering of the ammonium assimilation. Metabolic Engineering, 2(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1006/mben.1999.0140
  21. Nyachaka, C., Yawas, D., & Pam, G. (2013). Production and performance evaluation of bioethanol fuel from groundnut shell waste. American Journal of Engineering Research, 2(12), 303–312.
  22. Owusu, W. A., & Marfo, S. A. (2023). Artificial intelligence application in bioethanol production. International Journal of Energy Research, 2023, 7844835. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7844835
  23. Papapetridis, I., Van Dijk, M., Van Maris, A. J., & Pronk, J. T. (2017). Metabolic engineering strategies for optimizing acetate reduction, ethanol yield and osmotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 10(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0791-3
  24. Pilap, W., Thanonkeo, S., Klanrit, P., & Thanonkeo, P. (2022). The potential of multistress tolerant yeast, Saccharomycodes ludwigii, for second-generation bioethanol production. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 22062. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26686-x
  25. Sánchez, C., Santos, S., Sánchez, R., Lienemann, C.-P., & Todolí, J.-L. (2020). Profiling of organic compounds in bioethanol samples of different nature and the related fractions. ACS Omega, 5(33), 20912–20921. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c02360
  26. Sani, U., Abubakar, S., Suleiman, F., & Olabode, H. (2021). Proximate analysis and production of bioethanol from sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) white cultivars obtained from Samaru Zaria. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 14(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.4314/bajopas.v14i2.18
  27. Smith, J., Van Rensburg, E., & Görgens, J. F. (2014). Simultaneously improving xylose fermentation and tolerance to lignocellulosic inhibitors through evolutionary engineering of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae harbouring xylose isomerase. BMC Biotechnology, 14(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-14-41
  28. Tikhe, K., & Nadupuru, S. R. (2024). Lignocellulosic valorization of groundnut shells for bioethanol: Energy potential and techno-economic feasibility. Maejo International Journal of Energy and Environmental Communication, 6(3), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.54279/mijeec.v6i3.258826
  29. Torget, R. W., Kim, J. S., & Lee, Y. (2000). Fundamental aspects of dilute acid hydrolysis/fractionation kinetics of hardwood carbohydrates. 1. Cellulose hydrolysis. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 39(8), 2817–2825. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie990915q
  30. Tse, T. J., Wiens, D. J., & Reaney, M. J. T. (2021). Production of bioethanol—A review of factors affecting ethanol yield. Fermentation, 7(4), 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040268
  31. Vasilakou, K., Nimmegeers, P., Billen, P., & Van Passel, S. (2023). Geospatial environmental techno-economic assessment of pretreatment technologies for bioethanol production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 187, 113743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113743
  32. Zabed, H., Faruq, G., Sahu, J. N., Azirun, M. S., Hashim, R., & Nasrulhaq Boyce, A. (2014). Bioethanol production from fermentable sugar juice. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 957102. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/957102
  33. Zhang, H., Zhang, P., Wu, T., & Ruan, H. (2023). Bioethanol production based on Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Opportunities and challenges. Fermentation, 9(8), 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9080709
  34. Zhang, L., Tang, Y., Guo, Z.-P., Ding, Z.-Y., & Shi, G.-Y. (2011). Improving the ethanol yield by reducing glycerol formation using cofactor regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology Letters, 33(7), 1375–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-011-0588-6
  35. Zheng, W., Phoungthong, K., Lü, F., Shao, L.-M., & He, P.-J. (2013). Evaluation of a classification method for biodegradable solid wastes using anaerobic degradation parameters. Waste Management, 33(12), 2632–2640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.015